About the King James Version

Why the KJV

A Translation Built on a Preserved Text

Translated from the Biblical Languages

The King James Version was translated from the languages in which the Scriptures were originally written. The Old Testament was translated primarily from Hebrew, with its smaller Aramaic portions translated directly from that language. The New Testament was translated from Greek.

This does not mean that the translators possessed the original pages written by Moses, David, the prophets, the apostles, or their scribes. Those original documents—sometimes called the autographs—are no longer known to exist. Instead, the translators worked from Hebrew and Greek texts representing the Scriptures that had been carefully copied, preserved, and passed down through many generations.

For the Old Testament, they relied primarily upon the traditional Hebrew Masoretic Text. For the New Testament, they used editions of the traditional Greek text that later became commonly known as the Textus Receptus, Latin for the “Received Text.” The name Textus Receptus was introduced after the KJV was published, but it now identifies the general line of printed Greek texts used by the translators.

This is an important part of why many Christians trust the KJV. Its underlying text represents the traditional Hebrew and Greek Scriptures received, copied, read, and preserved among God’s people across the centuries.

An Extraordinary Company of Translators

King James I commissioned the new English translation following the Hampton Court Conference of 1604. Fifty-four men were originally nominated for the work, and approximately forty-seven are known to have participated. They were organized into six companies that met at Westminster, Oxford, and Cambridge.

This was not a small project entrusted to one translator or controlled by a modern publishing company. It was a carefully organized undertaking involving some of the most accomplished biblical scholars and linguists of their generation.

Among them were professors of Hebrew and Greek, university leaders, theologians, churchmen, and authorities in ancient languages. Collectively, they possessed remarkable knowledge of Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Aramaic—then commonly called Chaldee—Syriac, Arabic, and other languages relevant to biblical study.

For example, Edward Lively had served as Regius Professor of Hebrew at Cambridge for approximately twenty-five years. Richard Kilby was Oxford’s Regius Professor of Hebrew. John Bois was an accomplished Greek scholar, while Miles Smith was known for his knowledge of Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Chaldee, Syriac, and Arabic. William Bedwell was regarded as one of the leading Arabic scholars of his time.

It would be inaccurate to claim that every translator personally mastered dozens of languages. Nevertheless, their combined knowledge was extraordinary. It would be difficult to find another English Bible translation produced by a body of scholars with the same breadth of linguistic learning, theological knowledge, and familiarity with the history of the biblical text.

Their work also passed through multiple levels of examination. Individual translators studied assigned passages, each company reviewed the work together, completed books were circulated among the other companies, and difficult questions could be referred to other learned men. The translation was then subjected to a final general review. This process provided layers of comparison and accountability rather than leaving the wording to the judgment of one person. The surviving translation rules describe this extensive review process. The Rules to Be Observed in the Translation

Building Upon Tyndale and Earlier English Bibles

The KJV translators did not disregard the faithful English translation work that had already been completed. They were instructed to use the Bishops’ Bible as their starting point and to alter it wherever greater faithfulness to the Hebrew and Greek required a change.

They were also expressly permitted to consult several earlier English Bibles, including Tyndale’s translation, Matthew’s Bible, Coverdale’s Bible, the Great Bible, and the Geneva Bible whenever those translations agreed more closely with the original-language text.

William Tyndale’s influence was especially important. His pioneering work gave the English-speaking world a clear and direct translation based upon Hebrew and Greek, and much of his memorable language was preserved through later English Bibles and ultimately in the KJV.

The King James Version therefore did not appear in isolation. It brought together generations of English Bible translation, retained wording that had already proved faithful and understandable, and subjected that inheritance to a new and extensive examination by a large company of accomplished scholars.

The result was not an unnecessary rewriting of Scripture. It was a careful refinement of the English Bible, grounded in the traditional Hebrew and Greek texts and produced through an unusually thorough process of translation, comparison, and review.

God’s Word Should Be Freely Available

The Bible is not an ordinary book, it is the Word of God, given so that people everywhere may know the truth and hear the message of salvation. It should be read, preached, recorded, translated into useful formats, and shared as widely as possible.

One important advantage of the King James Version is that its complete text can be freely used throughout most of the world. Churches, ministries, publishers, developers, and individuals can print it, record it, place it online, build study tools around it, and distribute it without negotiating a license with a modern copyright owner.

This freedom makes projects such as KJV Audio Bible possible. We can provide all sixty-six books in text and audio, create a searchable Bible database, and allow people to read, hear, study, and share Scripture without limiting them to a small number of verses.

The United Kingdom Exception

Because the KJV was published in 1611, its biblical text is generally treated as public domain in the United States and most other countries. The United Kingdom is the important exception.

Within the UK, rights in the Authorized Version—another name for the KJV—are vested in the Crown and administered through royal authority and authorized publishers. These are special Crown rights rather than an ordinary modern copyright.

Cambridge University Press generally permits up to 500 verses to be reproduced for certain liturgical and noncommercial educational uses without individual permission. However, the quotation cannot include an entire biblical book, make up 25 percent or more of the work containing it, or omit the required acknowledgment. Uses beyond those conditions require permission.

The accurate statement, therefore, is that the KJV is freely usable and treated as public domain throughout most of the world, with a significant exception in the United Kingdom.

Copyright Restrictions on Modern Translations

Most widely used modern English Bible translations are protected by copyright. Publishers usually permit limited quotations, but their conditions commonly include restrictions such as:

  • No more than 500 verses
  • No complete book of the Bible
  • No more than a specified percentage of the work containing the quotations
  • Required copyright acknowledgments
  • Additional permission for websites, apps, databases, audio recordings, or commercial products

The exact rules vary. For example, the NIV and NLT generally permit up to 500 verses under standard conditions. The ESV also uses a 500-verse limit, although it restricts quotations to less than one-half of any biblical book rather than prohibiting every complete book under 500 verses.

A few modern translations have been released into the public domain or under open licenses. Nevertheless, most modern translations commonly used in churches and bookstores cannot be freely reproduced in their entirety.

These restrictions may not present a problem when quoting a few verses in a sermon or article. They become far more important when publishing a complete Bible, producing an audio Bible, or building searchable Scripture software.

Outside the United Kingdom, the KJV places no such licensing barrier between the biblical text and those who want to read, hear, study, reproduce, or distribute it.

New Editions and New Copyright Claims

Modern Bible translations are periodically revised, producing updated editions with newly copyrighted wording. Under United States law, there is no fixed number or percentage of words that must be changed. A revision may receive copyright protection when its changes contain sufficient original expression. However, that new copyright protects only the newly added or altered material; it does not restart or extend the copyright on the unchanged portions of an earlier edition. The U.S. Copyright Office explicitly states that a derivative work cannot be used to extend the protection of the original work. U.S. Copyright Office: Copyright in Derivative Works

This pattern can be seen in modern Bible publishing. The NASB has copyrighted editions dated 1971, 1977, 1995, and 2020. Its publisher states that every verse was reviewed for the NASB 2020 update. The ESV, first published in 2001, received another update in 2025 involving 68 word changes across 42 verses. NASB 2020 ESV 2025 Update

Publishers may sincerely believe that these revisions improve accuracy or readability. Nevertheless, every update also creates a new edition that can be promoted, sold, and licensed. Some publishers even license only the latest edition of their Bible texts. Biblica Permissions

It would be unfair to claim without evidence that publishers change Scripture solely for profit. The system does, however, create an ongoing commercial opportunity: revised wording can become newly protected material, while the latest edition generates new Bible sales and licensing agreements. In contrast, the KJV has provided generations of readers with a stable English text that remains freely reproducible throughout most of the world.

Do Modern Bible Versions Alter Sound Doctrine?

Mark 10:24 — Is Salvation Itself Hard?

Mark 10:24 concerns the central doctrine of salvation. In the KJV, Christ identifies the particular obstacle: trusting in riches. The NIV removes that qualification, making the verse appear to say that entering the kingdom of God is generally difficult.

King James Version — Mark 10:24

“And the disciples were astonished at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!”

New International Version — Mark 10:24

“The disciples were amazed at his words. But Jesus said again, ‘Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God!’”

The difference is doctrinally significant. According to the KJV, the difficulty does not lie in salvation itself, which is received as a free gift through faith in Jesus Christ. It lies in persuading those who trust in their wealth, abilities, and self-sufficiency to humble themselves and depend entirely upon Christ. By removing “for them that trust in riches,” the NIV’s wording can suggest that entering God’s kingdom is inherently difficult—an idea that may be understood as requiring human effort—rather than emphasizing the spiritual obstacle created by misplaced trust.

1 John 5:7 — The Bible’s Clearest Statement of the Trinity

The doctrine of the Trinity is taught throughout Scripture, but 1 John 5:7 in the KJV states it with exceptional clarity. It identifies the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost as three distinct heavenly witnesses and then plainly declares their unity: “these three are one.” The word Trinity means “three in one,” making this verse one of the clearest statements of that doctrine.

King James Version — 1 John 5:7

“For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.”

New International Version — 1 John 5:7–8

“For there are three that testify: the Spirit, the water and the blood; and the three are in agreement.”

In the NIV, verse 7 is reduced to “For there are three that testify,” while the witnesses are identified in verse 8 as the Spirit, the water, and the blood. The Father and the Word are no longer named, the heavenly witness is removed, and “these three are one” becomes “the three are in agreement.” Although the Trinity may be supported from other passages, this change removes the Bible’s most direct, self-contained declaration that the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost are three in one.

1 Corinthians 1:18 — Saved or Being Saved?

The wording of 1 Corinthians 1:18 affects how the reader understands salvation. The KJV describes believers as people who “are saved,” presenting salvation as an accomplished reality. The NKJV changes this to “are being saved,” which presents salvation in this verse as an ongoing process.

King James Version — 1 Corinthians 1:18

“For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.”

New King James Version — 1 Corinthians 1:18

“For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.”

This is more than a modernization of older English. “Are saved” describes believers as already possessing salvation through faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ. “Are being saved” can imply that their salvation remains in progress and is not yet complete. Although Christian growth and sanctification continue throughout a believer’s life, salvation itself is received when a person places faith in Christ. The KJV preserves that distinction clearly in this passage.

Acts 8:37 — Belief Before Baptism

Acts 8 records Philip preaching Jesus to an Ethiopian eunuch. When they reach water, the eunuch asks what prevents him from being baptized. In the KJV, Philip answers with a clear requirement: the man must first believe with all his heart. The eunuch then openly confesses his faith in Jesus Christ.

King James Version — Acts 8:37

“And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”

New International Version — Acts 8:36–38

“Look, here is water. What can stand in the way of my being baptized?”

[Verse 37 is omitted from the main text.]

“And he gave orders to stop the chariot.”

The NIV and many other modern versions move Acts 8:37 out of the main text, sometimes preserving it only in a footnote. As a result, the narrative proceeds directly from the eunuch’s request to his baptism without recording Philip’s requirement or the eunuch’s confession of faith. The KJV establishes the biblical order plainly: the gospel is preached, the individual personally believes in Jesus Christ, and baptism follows. This directly challenges infant baptism and any practice in which baptism is administered before a person is capable of personally believing and confessing Christ.

Proverbs 23:14 — Hell or Death?

The KJV repeatedly uses the word hell in the Old Testament, while the NIV removes the word entirely from its Old Testament text, usually replacing it with terms such as the grave, death, or the realm of the dead. This can leave modern-version readers with the mistaken impression that hell is exclusively a New Testament doctrine. Proverbs 23:14 provides a clear example of how this translation choice changes the apparent meaning.

King James Version — Proverbs 23:14

“Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell.”

New International Version — Proverbs 23:14

“Punish them with the rod and save them from death.”

The KJV connects parental correction with rescuing a child’s soul from hell, emphasizing the eternal spiritual consequences of allowing sinful behavior to continue without discipline. The NIV changes hell to death, which can be understood as referring only to physical death, and it softens “beat him with the rod” to “punish them with the rod.” Modern translators may defend death as a contextual interpretation of the Hebrew word Sheol, but death and hell are not identical concepts. The result is that the explicit warning about the soul and hell disappears from the verse—and, in the NIV, the word hell disappears from the entire Old Testament.

Micah 5:2 — From Everlasting or From Ancient Times?

Micah 5:2 is a prophecy of Christ’s birth in Bethlehem. Because Jesus Christ is God manifested in the flesh, He did not begin to exist at His earthly birth. He is eternal and has always existed. The KJV expresses this clearly by describing His goings forth as being “from everlasting.”

King James Version — Micah 5:2

“But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.”

New International Version — Micah 5:2

“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The difference between everlasting and ancient times is significant. “From everlasting” describes existence extending eternally into the past without a beginning. By contrast, the word origins commonly suggests a point at which someone or something began, while ancient times describes a distant but finite past. The NIV translators chose wording that is far less explicit and can give the impression that Christ had an origin. The KJV clearly preserves the eternal preexistence of Jesus Christ in this prophecy.

Deuteronomy 22:28–29 — Does the Bible Require a Victim to Marry Her Rapist?

Critics sometimes accuse the Bible of requiring a woman to marry the man who raped her. The wording of Deuteronomy 22:28–29 differs sharply between the KJV and the NIV. The KJV does not describe the act as rape or say that the woman was forced; the NIV explicitly inserts the interpretation that the man “rapes her.”

King James Version — Deuteronomy 22:28–29

“If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel’s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.”

New International Version — Deuteronomy 22:28–29

“If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, he shall pay her father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the young woman, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.”

The difference is substantial. In the KJV, an unmarried woman has been humbled through sexual relations, the two are discovered, and the man is held permanently responsible for what he has done. The wording does not identify the act as forcible assault. Just a few verses earlier, Deuteronomy 22:25–27 specifically addresses a man who forces a woman. In that case, the woman is declared innocent and the man is required to be put to death. The Bible therefore treats forcible rape separately and assigns the death penalty to the attacker; it does not resolve that crime by requiring the victim to marry him.

The NIV makes rape part of verses 28–29 themselves and therefore appears to command that a rape victim marry her attacker. This controversial accusation against Scripture follows directly from the NIV’s interpretive wording, not from an explicit statement in the KJV.

The Answer: Modern Versions Can Alter Sound Doctrine

Do modern Bible versions alter sound doctrine? The comparisons above show that the answer is yes. Modern versions often omit important words and entire verses, replace clear doctrinal statements with less precise language, or introduce interpretations that change how a passage is understood. These changes affect teachings concerning salvation, the Trinity, baptism, hell, the eternal existence of Christ, and even the proper meaning of biblical law. When wording changes what a passage plainly teaches, the difference is not merely a matter of updated language or reading style.

These seven examples represent only a small portion of the evidence. This article could be filled with dozens of additional passages in which modern versions weaken, obscure, omit, or confuse sound and settled biblical doctrine. The problem becomes still greater in highly paraphrased versions such as The Message, where the text is freely restated according to one writer’s interpretation rather than closely translated word for word. The farther a version moves from the precise words of Scripture, the more human opinion is permitted to shape what the reader receives as the Word of God.

This is one of the most important reasons we use and recommend the King James Version. Its stable and time-tested text speaks with doctrinal clarity, allowing Scripture to define and interpret itself rather than filtering its meaning through continually changing modern language and editorial judgment.

Why KJV Audio Bible Uses the King James Version

Our decision to use and promote the King James Version at KJVAudioBible.com is not merely a matter of convenience, public-domain availability, or avoiding copyright licenses and usage fees. Those freedoms help us make the complete Bible more accessible, but they are not the foundation of our choice.

We use the KJV because we believe it is the perfect and preserved Word of God in English—faithfully translated without error into the world’s most widely understood language. We do not regard it as simply one acceptable version among many. It is the English Bible that matters: a settled and trustworthy text through which generations have heard the gospel, learned sound doctrine, and grown in the knowledge of God.

The purpose of KJV Audio Bible is to make that Word available to as many people as possible. Every recording, reading plan, search tool, and study feature exists to help people read it, hear it, understand it, and share it freely. God has preserved His Word; our mission is to help make it accessible.